Senin, 19 Januari 2009

Was there a Da Vinci Conspiracy?

The Da Vinci Code is not to be ignored as a fictional plot. Its premise, that Jesus Christ has been reinvented for political purposes, attacks the very foundation of Christianity. Its author, Dan Brown, has stated on national TV that, even though the plot is fictional, he believes its account of Jesus' identity is true. So what is the truth? Let's take a look.

  • Did Jesus have a secret marriage with Mary Magdalene?
  • Was Jesus' divinity invented by Constantine and the church?
  • Were the original records of Jesus destroyed?
  • Do recently discovered manuscripts tell the truth about Jesus?
Has a gigantic conspiracy resulted in the reinvention of Jesus? According to the book and movie, The Da Vinci Code, that is exactly what happened. Several of the book's assertions regarding Jesus smack of conspiracy. For example, the book states:
"Nobody is saying Christ was a fraud, or denying that He walked the earth and inspired millions to better lives. All we are saying is that Constantine took advantage of Christ's substantial influence and importance. And in doing so, he shaped the face of Christianity as we know it today."1

Could this shocking assertion from Dan Brown's best-selling book be true? Or is the premise behind it just the stuff of a good conspiracy novel--on a par with a belief that aliens crash-landed at Roswell, New Mexico, or that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll in Dallas when JFK was assassinated?

Either way, the story is compelling. No wonder Brown's book has become one of the best-selling stories of the decade.

Did Jesus claim to be God?

Many are willing to accept Jesus Christ as a good man, or a great prophet, but argue that Jesus never claimed to be God. Those who deny Jesus’ deity point out scriptures that back up their belief that Jesus never intended to be worshipped as God.

The evidence, however, indicates that from the time of the apostles, Jesus was worshipped as Lord. After the apostles died, several first and second century church leaders wrote of Jesus’ deity. Finally in 325 A. D. the leadership of the church articulated the belief that Jesus is fully God.

Some argue that the church “invented” Jesus’ deity by rewriting the gospel accounts. In fact, the world’s best-selling fictional book, The Da Vinci Code sold over 40 million books by making that claim (See “Was there a Da Vinci Conspiracy?”). Although the book made its author, Dan Brown, wealthy, his fictional account was debunked by scholars as bad history. In fact, the New Testament has been deemed the “most reliable of all ancient historical documents” (See. “Are the Gospels True?”).

In this article we will examine what Jesus Christ said about himself. What did Jesus mean by the terms, “Son of Man,” and “Son of God?” If Jesus wasn’t God, why did his enemies accuse him of “blasphemy?” More importantly, if Jesus wasn’t God, why did he accept worship?

First let’s look briefly at what Christians believe about Jesus Christ.

From Creator to Carpenter?

At the core of Christianity is the belief that God came to earth in the Person of His Son, Jesus Christ. The Bible teaches that Jesus is not a created being like the angels, but is the very Creator of the universe. As theologian J. I. Packer writes, “The gospel tells us that our Creator has become our Redeemer.”2

The New Testament reveals that, in accordance with his Father’s will, Jesus temporarily set aside his power and glory to become a tiny helpless baby. As he grew, Jesus worked in a carpenter shop, experienced hunger, got tired, and suffered pain and death like us. Then at age 30 he began his public ministry.

Jesus and Mary Magdalene:

Did they have a secret marriage?

Mrs. Jesus

Has history been wrong for 2000 years---was there a Mrs. Jesus Christ? In, “The Jesus Family Tomb,” (The Discovery Channel’s TV documentary) director Simcha Jacobovici claims there is “evidence” that Jesus and Mary Magdalene indeed were married and had a son named Judah.

(To see what scholars say about Jacobovici’s “evidence” see, "The Jesus Family Tomb)" article .

Jacobovici is not the first to postulate a possible romantic relationship between Jesus and Mary. The movie, The Last Temptation of Christ, and books such as Holy Blood, Holy Grail, and The Da Vinci Code, made a secret relationship between Jesus and Mary central to their themes.

The Da Vinci Code begins with a page of facts that makes the fictional novel appear to be true in all its assertions. The book has broken all records on the New York Times best-sellers list, and has been followed by a blockbuster movie. Author Dan Brown’s clever weaving of fact with fiction has convinced many readers that Jesus and Mary Magdalene really were married and had a child (See “Mona Lisa’s Smirk”). But is this romantic assertion just hype to sell books and movies, or is it supported by historical evidence.


Mysterious Mary

Before we examine the evidence for any possible romance between Jesus and Mary Magdalene, let’s look into this person of Mary from the little Galilean town of Magdala. To begin we ask the question, what ancient documents shed light upon her character and her relationship with Jesus of Nazareth?

The New Testament gospels are the oldest written records of Mary of Magdala. In the gospels Mary is depicted as a woman who Jesus healed of demon possession. The gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John) present Mary as a follower of Jesus who listened to his teaching, provided for his financial needs, witnessed his crucifixion, and three days later was first to see him alive.

Some have said Mary Magdalene was a prostitute, but neither the apostles nor the early church speak of her as more than one of Jesus’ close disciples. The idea that she was a prostitute originated in the sixth century, when Pope Gregory I identified her as both the woman spoken of in Luke 7:37, and the woman who washed Jesus’ feet with her hair.

Although the pope’s view was probably influenced by the fact that Jesus had cast seven demons out of her, no biblical scholar is able to make the connection of Mary Magdalene with the woman in Luke’s passage. Additionally, the New Testament gospels don’t even hint of anything romantic or sexual between Jesus and Mary.

So where do conspiracy theorists get the idea? Why all the speculation? For that we turn to documents written 100-200 years after the New Testament gospels by a non-Christian cult called the Gnostics (See "Gnostic Gospels)". These writings are not part of the New Testament, and were rejected by early Christians as heretical. Those who write of a romantic relationship between Jesus and Mary cite a few passages from two of those writings, the Gospel of Mary and the Gospel of Philip. Let’s look at those passages.

The Gnostic Gospels:

Are they the real history of Jesus?

Are there secret writings about Jesus?

In 1945 a discovery was made in Upper Egypt, near the town of Nag Hammadi. Fifty-two copies of ancient writings, called the Gnostic gospels were found in 13 leather-bound papyrus codices (handwritten books). They were written in Coptic and belonged to a library in a monastery.

A few Gnostic scholars have gone so far as to assert that these recently discovered writings are the authentic history of Jesus instead of the New Testament. But does their faith in these documents square with the historical evidence? Let’s take a deeper look to see if we can separate truth from fiction.

Secret "Knowers"

The Gnostic gospels are attributed to a group known as (big surprise here) the Gnostics. Their name comes from the Greek word gnosis, meaning “knowledge.” These people thought they had secret, special knowledge hidden from ordinary people.

As Christianity spread, the Gnostics mixed some doctrines and elements of Christian­ity into their beliefs, morphing Gnosticism into a counterfeit Christianity. Perhaps they did it to keep recruitment numbers up and make Jesus a poster child for their cause. However, for their system of thought to fit with Christianity, Jesus needed to be rein­vented, stripped of both his humanity and his absolute deity.

In The Oxford History of Christianity John McManners wrote of the Gnostics’ mixture of Christian and mythical beliefs.

Gnosticism was (and still is) a theoso­phy with many ingredients. Occult­ism and oriental mysticism became fused with astrology, magic. … They collected sayings of Jesus shaped to fit their own interpretation (as in the Gospel of Thomas), and offered their adherents an alternative or rival form of Christianity

The Jesus Family Tomb:

Fact or Fiction?

Jesus' Bones Discovered?

Has the tomb of Jesus Christ been discovered in the Jerusalem suburb of Talpiot?

In a 2007 Discovery Channel TV documentary, producer James Cameron (The Titanic) and Jewish director, Simcha Jacobovici, attempted to prove that Jesus’ burial cave and bones were discovered near Jerusalem. Cameron and Jacobovici further cited evidence that Jesus sired a son with Mary Magdalene.

If Jesus Christ’s tomb has really been discovered, then all of Christian history has been based upon a false claim---that Jesus physically rose from the dead, was seen alive by over 500 followers at once, spent 40 days teaching his disciples, and then ascended into heaven. But before we get caught up in another Da Vinci type conspiracy, let’s look at the facts behind Cameron’s claims.

The Facts Claimed:

1. In 1980 ten limestone bone boxes (ossuaries) dated to the first century, were discovered in an excavated tomb in the Jerusalem suburb of Talpiot.

2. Six inscriptions were discovered with names similar to or the same as some of Jesus Christ’s family and disciples:

  • Jesua, son of Joseph,
  • Mary
  • Mariamene e Mara
  • Mathew
  • Jofa
  • Judah, son of Jesua.

3. Cameron attempts to prove that Mariamene e Mara is Mary of Magdalene, and that she and Jesus had a son named "Judah son of Jesua".

4. DNA analysis identifies that tissues from the ossuaries of Jesua and Mariamene e Mara were not related, raising the possibility they may have been married and had a child.

Checking the Evidence

So, what are the odds that this is Jesus’ tomb? According to Cameron and Jacobovici, the statistical improbability of these names belonging to another family than that of Jesus Christ is 600 to 1. However, scholars challenge many of the assumptions in their interpretation of the facts. Let’s look:

1. It is true that these ossuaries were discovered in an ancient tomb. But thousands of similar tombs have been discovered in Jerusalem. And ossuaries were often used for the bones of more than one individual. In fact, according to Dr. Craig Evans, PhD, author of Jesus and the Ossuaries, the tomb carried the bones of about 35 different individuals, and about half were from these ossuaries. Evans also notes that there was considerable contamination of the site.

2. Are Cameron and Jacobovici correct about the names they assert are on the ossuaries? Not according to many experts. Some were written in Aramaic, others in Hebrew, and another in Greek. This indicates they were not buried in a similar time period. It is not even clear that “Jesus” is named on any of the ossuaries. Dr. Evans’s personal examination of the ossuary was inconclusive. Stephen Pfann, a biblical scholar at the University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem, is also unsure that the name "Jesus" on the caskets was read correctly. He thinks it's more likely the name "Hanun." Ancient Semitic script is notoriously difficult to decipher.

Additionally, it should be noted that the names of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph were extremely common in the first century. About 25% of the women in Jesus’ day were named Mary. Joseph was also a common name. And about one in ten had the name, “Jesua”. Dr. Evans indicates that approximately 100 tombs have been discovered in Jerusalem with the name “Jesus” and 200 with the name “Joseph.” The name “Mary” is on far more.

"Each name with the exception of Mariamene seemed common to their period, and it was only in 1996 that the BBC made a film suggesting that, given the combination, it might be that family. The idea was eventually discounted, however, because, as New Testament scholar Richard Bauckham asserted 'the names with Biblical resonance are so common that even when you run the probabilities on the group, the odds of it being the famous Jesus' family are "very low."

3. The statistical support for the entire “Jesus tomb” theory rises or falls on the question of Mary Magdalene. So did the name Mariamene e Mara mean Mary Magdalene, as Cameron and Jacobovici attempt to prove? Not according to most experts. Their interpretation is simply not supported by evidence. Bauckham notes, “The first use of ‘Mariamene’ for Magdalene dates to a scholar who was born in 185, suggesting that Magdalene wouldn't have been called that at her death. “

So, even though Cameron and Jacobovici employed a statistician, Andrey Feuerverger, to support their case, his numbers were based upon assumptions disputed by the majority of scholars. In fact, Feuerverger himself admits that the assumptions were given to him by Jacobovici, and that the single biggest factor in his 600 to 1 odds was the identity of Mariamene e Mara being Mary of Magdalene. Feuerverger defends his role in an interview with Scientific American, "I did permit the number one in 600 to be used in the film—I'm prepared to stand behind that but on the understanding that these numbers were calculated based on assumptions that I was asked to use."

Yet Dr. Randy Ingermanson’s statistical analysis of the probability indicates that there is less than one chance in 10,000 that this was the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth.

4. But what about the DNA tests? Doesn’t that prove Jesus was in the tomb? Let’s look closer at what the DNA test measured. It took residue (there were no bones to examine) from the ossuaries Jacobovici identified as belonging to both Jesua and Mariamene, and used mitochondrial DNA testing to see if they were related. The results proved to be negative, indicating to him that the two individuals were not related maternally. He thus assumes the two were married. But Bauckham isn’t impressed. He writes, “If ‘Jesus’ and ‘Mariamene’ weren't related matrilineally, why jump to the conclusion that they were husband and wife, rather than being related through their fathers? “

It is the fact that these particular names have been discovered in the same tomb that has fueled speculation that it really could be Jesus’ tomb. But many scholars believe Cameron and Jacobovici have skewed the evidence to build a case that just isn’t there. Additionally, there are many contradictory questions that need to be answered before one jumps to a conclusion that overturns centuries of historical scholarship.


Is Jesus God?

Have you ever met somebody with such personal magnetism that he/she is always the center of attention? Possibly his/her personality or intelligence---but something about him/her is enigmatic. Well, that’s the way it was two thousand years ago with Jesus Christ.

Jesus’ greatness was obvious to all those who saw and heard him. But, whereas most great people simply fade into history books, Jesus of Nazareth is still the focus of numerous books and media controversy. And much of that controversy revolves around the radical claims Jesus made about himself.

As an unheralded carpenter from an obscure Galilean village in Israel, Jesus made claims that, if true, have profound implications on our lives. According to Jesus, you and I are special, part of a grand cosmic scheme, with him as the center of it all. This and other claims like it stunned everyone who heard them uttered.

It was primarily Jesus’ outrageous claims that caused him to be viewed as a crackpot by both the Roman authorities and the Jewish hierarchy. Although he was an outsider with no credentials or political powerbase, within three years, Jesus changed the world for the next 20 centuries. Other moral and religious leaders have left an impact---but nothing like that unknown carpenter from Nazareth.

What was it about Jesus Christ that made the difference? Was he merely a great man, or something more?

These questions get to the heart of who Jesus really was. Some believe he was merely a great moral teacher; others believe he was simply the leader of the world’s greatest religion. But many believe something far more. Christians believe that God has actually visited us in human form. And they believe the evidence backs that up. So who is the real Jesus? Let’s take a closer look.

As we take a deeper look at the world’s most controversial person, we begin by asking: could Jesus have been merely a great moral teacher?

Pater Beek Biography

Educatio puerorum reformatio Mundi
Educating young people is the improvement of the world



Garden of Gethsemane on the night is in the silence. Peziarahan the end of the standstill, and it is eternal resting place of the Jesuits in Indonesia that, for the Society of Jesus frater novis also often stops when they become the night watch duty.

Gravestone in front of the gravestone-Jesuits who die have been the young Jesus Indonesia States is often missed in the early morning silence prayers and memories on the work of the predecessor. In remembrance and prayers on those who have eternal rest, the young people a new way menapaki call priesthood draw spirited spirit who works based on the Spiritual Exercises of Saint Ignasius Loyola.



On the gravestone-tier simple white headstone is the name of Nicolaus Driyarkara SJ, a flusuf that at this time his name enshrined as the School Philosophy. Then there is the name Josephus Gerardus Beek SJ, usually called Pater Beek, figures that do not often called the quiet by the novis. Why? One of his current foster young children through a seclusion (khasebul) are often considered as the elite kaderisasi, all confidential, and impressed by stealth. In addition, the process kaderisasi been combined with the hard physical training, spartan and all-round training is intensive prayer, had invited a lot of reaction.



Not infrequently that I reject that approach, said Beek is the Machiavelli. About that, at times most people away on his only stop in khasebul and put the figure as a hard, firm, sometimes a little rough because it involves the physical punishment, such as tampanan.



Therefore, it is easily positioned in a controversial private. Of course, for those who know or have a child didiknya, Beek is not like that. He may be controversial because it is a firm principle, not cash, confident, and not half-half.

For Beek classmates, he does not want it appeared. Frugality (asketis) dipegangnya firm so that it does not float in popularity. His name is known, but people rarely see sosoknya. "In this world do not make the monument, will be difficult if you want to die," said Pater Beek.

Dikobarkan life by the spirit of the Spiritual Exercises of Saint Ignasius Loyola have put them as the salt in each of the ditekuninya. Perseverance that produce superior results, printed on cadres binaannya or through the influence of ideas that can change the world. Everyone involved felt, but did not see it, that's the sosoknya and salt, while there is also no.



Time critical



In the book biography written by JB Soedamanta and published by Obor this, things that formerly obscure and full of controversy peeled. In setebal 272 page book that, Soedarmanto also include open letter to Pater Beek Bung Karno, Indonesia Leader of Revolution.



Mail is full of sharp criticism of the policies of President Soekarno votes gave large space for the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI). By using the fictitious name Dadap Waru, in a letter dated 5 November 1965 that he was encouraged that Bung Karno be firmly against the PKI.



In addition to never work sebagal The Boarding Realino, Pater Beek also participated in the work and the Bureau of Documentation. Bino Documentation is a bureau established by the Society of Jesus Province of Indonesia in 1961 During the Pater Georgius Kester become Provinsial. Bureau is to provide materials and analysis of the study based on measurements Catholic morality and teachings that can be used for the activists.



In operations, the bureau broadcast documents about government policy and evaluation of various important events in Indonesia. What is the Bureau of Documentation and Feed into the community, especially the Catholics in Indonesia, for the development of social, political, community, and be critical of the government.



This is indicated by proximity of the Catholic Church with the Bung Karno, but at the same time distance. Catholic party, for example, formed the League for Democracy and Nasakom does not support the draft and refused to open the President of the entrance to the communist nation.



According to Beek, of the Catholic Church is not only a contribution to the community, but also be sure, the Church also have principles that are appropriate for the problem. According to him, apostolic very important intellectual and necessary at that time.

Analysis Bureau produced documentation and distributed to the activists involved in the Front and the Pancasila Sekber Golkar. Bureau that, among other things, the study of socialism, which was then mempertemukannya with intepretasi idea that socialism disodorkan PKI. In books about Pater Beek, the idea of the study and other documentation that the Bureau of the full inclusion by Soedarmanta.



But on the other hand, are also ideas about Katolisitas Pater Beek. He argues, religious, in this case kekatolikan, not just a religious institution.



Soedarmanta write, Pater Beek holds that in matters of social or social fact "flag" Catholics are not needed anymore because in the context keindonesiaan, it would be a barrier togetherness.



Called the barrier because it can raise bond primordialisme, sektarian spirit, and ideologisasi religion. As a result, the Catholic does not have to just "sit" in the Catholic party (p. 202).

To that end, Pater Beek exempt children didiknya and cadres who dibinanya to choose the party that would accept and comply with their aspirations and can contribute best.

Golkar emerged before, Pater Beek, write Soedarmanta, encourage people entering Catholic PNI so in those terms have Markatul (Marhaen Catholic). However, in other parts of the mentioned, when a child didiknya ask which party he should go, Pater Beek said, "It is you, select your heart in accordance with sound! That is your duty and not tugasku, "said Beek.



In the book is also written about the attitude Pater Beek very antikomunisme and anti-PKI. As an ecclesiastic, and attitude that is based on the principle that ketegasannya Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution is the basis togetherness as a nation the most reasonable and rational.



Kaderisasi



However, as ecclesiastic and educators, Pater Beek more interested in developing young people. At the end of 1966 he started the program Khasebul. Education for one month it is essentially a spiritual education focuses on prayer and meditation, introducing concrete situation the community, and diperkaya with the Social Teachings of the Catholic Church (p. 180).

According to him, cadres who are able to convulse the world; revolutionize society with small groups, a backbone of society, or a core in a community environment. Become cadres, it means to be something else from the other; crush in what is thought to run in the boundaries defined moral and ethical.

There militansi, would have a better attitude, dare to penetrate in the history of mankind and to bring hope. Faith effort on the basis that if someone is feeling uphold love as the highest good, but not any act of violence before the political and human rights violations against fellow citizens, has been de facto violation of the love that dimuliakannya (p. 183).



To reach the point is, in the process of educating cadres, a dligunakan Pater Beek often draw criticism. Principle, and how often disalah understand, even by children didiknya own.



Pater Beek holds, not human life and sport, physical and spiritual. Human life is full of spirit-sport or physical.



In psychological science, writing Soedarmanto, Pater Beek near the identity of the theory formulated by JCC Smart. Smart said that the body Reliability is also the resilience of the soul. People who do not hold ill will surely give up easily when disakiti.



Not surprisingly, if a month in seclusion, in addition to spiritual exercises, students also get educated penggemblengan more stringent physical spartan. Ditampar, soaked in cold water, mosquito dlikerubuti with hands and feet are tied to the chair exercises that are applied to children Pater Beek didiknya.



For students who are angry or less easy to be patient, be patient with binding the hands and feet in a chair at night and requested a bite nyarnuk. After an hour or two exercises, the students reflect and be together. However, he still educators who do not see child-resistant didiknya be afraid punishment.



In principle, the effort is a tool that every student is trained to know the characters themselves and form unggulnya. Excellence is not merely endure physical chastisement, more than that, the benefits of the dlitandai with the attitude of prayer and a tribute, and disciplined asketis high, and have the attitude, but at the same time full of empathy. As if he deliberately wanted to mark the child didiknya as he would like to mark a big name in English, which means large, not half-hearted and not beek in Dutch children, which means river.



"Being a cadre means something other than the other; Keranjingan in what is thought to run in the boundaries defined moral and ethical," said Pater Beek.



Children Amsterdam



Josephus Gerardus Beek was born in Amsterdam, Netherlands, on 12 March 1917. Characteristic of the Amsterdam blakblakan that, like the forthright and expressive, seemed a little arogan become characteristic of the Beek.

Beek was born as the youngest of four brothers. He was born to tika-World War I discharge. After the entry of Jesus to the States and became novis second year, he was sent to Indonesia.



Since the children he taught at the College, which is managed by Imam Jesuits. Since children are also taught not to be half-half. Beek young tempered since the beginning of the Jesuits in Iingkungan education that combines between humanism and religiositas.



When a novis, the spirit of youth dikobarkan with the passion to go to ground mission, Dutch East Indies, which is at once a political dependency on the government under the Netherlands, his country. When the Japanese occupied Indonesia, Pater Beek ever occupy internment camps.



In this book. story in the camp was also the illustration of the formation of self Beek spartan. At least, strengthen the idea that experience in galvanize students. And because this book is worth reading because it is not merely tokohnya which is still often considered to be controversial and full of mystery, but the fruit-fruit and spiritual exercise that is mentally and basic attitude and choice of acts that inspire the soul Pater Beek and children didiknya.

Become salty salt is ready to melt and disappear and not be seen, but always felt.